Archive for April, 2008

New books I’ve been reading

Sunday, April 13th, 2008

Just added these to my bookshelf…

The 4-Hour Work Week - Timothy Ferris
Interesting, some challenging ideas. Been reading this for about two days, its started falling apart because the spine glue melted in the sauna today, oops.

iWoz - Steve Wozniak (w/ Gine Smith)
Brilliant, inspiring, revealing. Amazing guy and a really down to earth, high flyer of a book.

Mavericks At Work - William C Taylor & Polly LaBarre
Been on this one since about February, not my fastest read, its good to pick up and put down and it lives on my breakfast table for that start-of-the-day inspirational read.

See what else is on my bookshelf here

Joost suffering in fight with big ‘old-media’ alliances

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

Joost is suffering as copycat services and alliances between old-media companies are taking a hold on the new generation of TV viewers.

This from the Sunday Times today…

JOOST, the online television service launched with a fanfare last year by the founders of internet telephony firm Skype, is preparing for a major retrenchment after failing to attract enough users and top-flight broadcasting rights.

The company is expected to rein in its global ambitions to focus solely on the US market.

Set up as an antidote to YouTube by Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis after they sold Skype to online auctioneer Ebay, Joost has been overshadowed by the success of the BBC’s iPlayer, and in America, Hulu, a collaboration between NBC and News Corporation, the ultimate owner of The Sunday Times.

It has struggled to convince media and sports companies to sell it global rights, which are normally parcelled out to broadcasters country by country.

Joost has also suffered from senior defections. Chief technology officer Dirk-Willem van Gulik jumped ship for the BBC earlier in the year.

The company raised £23m last May from backers including CBS, Viacom, Index Ventures and Sequoia Capital.

A spokeswoman insisted most of the cash was still in the bank.

“We are not shedding staff,” she said. “There are some situations where staff have been rea-ligned to better fit our needs.”

Zennstrom told The Sunday Times a year ago: “We want to change the way people watch television . . . liberating people from the programme guide.”

Joost is unlikely to close, however. “There are too many egos involved,” said one former employee.

The BBC iPlayer, which provides a free seven-day window for viewers to watch shows they missed the first time round, is recording up to 500,000 programme downloads a day.

In the summer, it will be joined by Kangaroo, a portal shared by the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, to show older content, which will be funded by advertising.

Original article is here.

Jay-Z follow Madonna with the new music business model

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

In an era where music companies are still battling to enforce DRM measures to protect ailing profits, some of the world’s biggest music stars are leaving them behind to embrace new revenue models.

This, from today’s Sunday Times…

HIP-HOP star Jay-Z has always seemed as interested in business as music. From a poor start in a tough Brooklyn neighbourhood, Jay-Z has lived the rapper’s dream, making millions and boasting about it all the way. His hits include Get This Money, I Love the Dough and More Money, More Cash, More Hoes.

Unlike many of his contemporaries, however, making cash seems to interest him more than spending it. The rapper, real name Shawn Carter, even “retired” from music in 2003 to spend more time with his money.

When Bill Gates wanted a hip-hop star for his spoof retirement video, Jay-Z, long-time partner of pop diva Beyoncé, was the natural choice.

Now Carter has cut one of the biggest deals in music history. It’s a deal that, depending on who you talk to, either points the way to a new model for the struggling music industry or highlights what a savvy player Jay-Z is, while spelling disaster for the company that signed it.

American concert promoter Live Nation hit the headlines last October when it signed a $120m (£60m) deal with Madonna. The pop queen dumped Warner Music, her long-time label, to do the deal, in a move that for some underlined the eroding power of the music industry’s big players.

Music has never been more present in people’s lives or more easily available, but the shift to digital sales has so far proved less profitable than the industry’s last successful business model - promoting an artist by any means it can to make money from CDs.

CD sales remain a profitable business, but as they decline, artists, music labels and concert promoters are all looking past them at alternative revenue sources, from T-shirt and ticket sales to ringtones and licensing songs for use in video games.

“The paradigm in the music business has shifted and as an artist and a businesswoman, I have to move with that shift,” Madonna said in a statement when she signed her deal. Other stars were listening.

Now Jay-Z - 10 years her junior - has dropped Def Jam, the label where he was once president, for a $150m deal with Live Nation.

The company signed a reported $100m deal with Irish rockers U2 last month to handle the band’s merchandising, digital and branding rights, and is also said to be in talks with The Rolling Stones, presently working out their contract at Britain’s EMI.

Like Madonna before him, in straight record sales Jay-Z, 38, is not the force he once was. American Gangster, his last album, sold about 1m copies in America compared with 3m copies of 2003’s The Black Album, but he has also found new artists and pursued other business ventures, such as a clothing line, Rocawear, which he sold last year for $204m, sports investments and a chain of nightclubs. Forbes magazine’s last annual list of “Hip-Hop Cash Kings” ranked Jay-Z first with estimated earnings of $34m in 2006.

The Live Nation deal, which is yet to be formally announced, is a “360degree” deal that will give the concert promoter a financial position in virtually every aspect of the rapper’s career. Jay-Z is expected to get a $25m payment upfront, $10m in advances for each of three albums, $25m towards concert performances and $20m for the publishing rights that he owns. He will also get $25m in overheads to run his side projects with $25m more available to finance acquisitions or investments. He and Live Nation will split any profits 50/50.

Many music executives were dismissive of Live Nation’s move. They pointed out that the major labels were all now doing “360degree” deals and said it was well known that Jay-Z had unsuccessfully touted this same deal to most of the big labels.

“This isn’t a new model,” said one. “It’s ‘let’s take ageing artists past their prime and overpay them’ - that’s a very old business model.”

He said he doubted if they would make back the $10m advances on his new albums and that Jay-Z was not a touring artist of Madonna’s calibre.

Live Nation has a ticket sales deal with Ticketmaster but that expires this year.

David Joyce, analyst for Miller Tabak, said the company was “circling the wagons” by building a roster of big-name artists to help it see off competition when it goes it alone. He said the traditional music-industry players were increasingly looking for a slice of Live Nation’s action. Cherry-picking top acts for top prices is one way to see off that competition.

Music executives said the real test of Jay-Z and Madonna’s deals will come when they have new albums to release. Unlike the record labels, Live Nation is not set up to get CDs into stores or digital music onto iTunes and will probably have to sign up a label to do the release.

Original article is here

Wildscreen - video sharing site offers 100% ad revenue share

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Wildscreen.TV Offers 100% Ad Revenue to Users
Wildscreen is a new video site hoping to combine quality content with a social media network. With a focus on quality instead of quantity, Wildscreen distances itself from the YouTube crowd by offering a space in which users can upload as much content as they want, with customized and branded channels.

Aimed at filmmakers, Wildscreen is also hoping to entice users in with the offering of full ownership of the channel, including 100% of the ad revenue going directly to that operator of the video channel. With no upload limitations or revenue splits, wilidscreen’s offering is just different enough to likely catch someone’s attention, as individuals are being presented with a number of experimental alternatives to the monetization of their online video content.

More on this is here

Daily Motion shows full length films

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Dailymotion the video-sharing site is taking things a step further with the inclusion of full length films in its new section, called Cinema Dailymotion. This is an online screening series for viewers to watch streaming, full-length films and documentaries.

More about this here

I never knew that CurrentTV was owned by Al Gore

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

I never knew that CurrentTV, that channel I sometimes stumble upon on my sky system in the UK (and often I actually stay for a while) was started, and has as its CEO, none other than Al Gore. Its on channel 193 on Sky UK and Ireland.

I just found out here on Techcrunch.

I love CurrentTV, it totally embraces the short-form web-like content that we’re all getting used to and gives people teh chance to get their productions from the Web to the TV. And it works. The quality, variery and pace of content is excellent, even the viewer created content (they use the term VC2 [V C squared) instead of UGC) links are fantastic.

(Looks like I’m not alone either, their website stats have been going through the roof, see their comscore graph on that Techcrunch article above.)

Attributor helps identify pirate media

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Attributor, who helps media companies protect their content, has raised $12 million in Series C funding. The company uses what it describes as “fingerprinting algorithms” to crawl the Web and identify when and where a publisher’s articles, images, or videos are being used, and if they are being used with proper licensing permissions.

In addition to protecting copyright content from malicious use, part of Attributor’s pitch is that by through better management, publishers can increase ad revenue, get more inbound links, and improve their search engine rankings. So far, Attributor has signed up several top media companies, including CondeNet, The Associated Press, and Reuters.

The company has now raised more than $20 million to-date, with its last round coming in December, 2006.

This is from Mashable here

Why you cant sell digital goods on ebay

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Brian Burke of eBay’s Trust & Safety department has a message for anyone wishing to unload digital products on the company’s trademark auction block: You can’t.

Instead, you’ll have to bypass the traditional transaction-based system that drives the vast majority of sales on the website and publish classified ads for things you want to sell that you can’t quite hold in your hand. The company cites the risk of feedback manipulation as a main reason for is choice to relegate sales of digital goods to a venue with non-auction parameters. The new rule was enacted March 31st.

If we’re to take human nature into account, this is a new law that understandably needs to be implemented and enforced. While it’d be an absolute pleasure to discover that all sellers looking to hawk bits to buyers work to do so through wholly legitimate means, it’d be much too much to expect for such business to be conducted entirely aboveboard. Rampant and unwarranted duplication would ensue, and because eBay is beholden to regulating activity within its auction framework (including the Buy-it-Now listings), it’s reasonable for the company to move to quash any allowance of digital sales via ordinary means.

Nonetheless, the company smartly still offers sellers interested in marketing digital goods the option to list classifieds devoid of any bidding utilities, in which it plays a sort of indirect facilitator of fully-electronic transactions. Sellers are required to pay a standard 30-day insertion fee of $9.95, plus any desired listing upgrades.

This from Mashable here

Korean ‘YouTube’ is expanding with $16m war chest

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Pandora.TV, South Korea’s largest user generated video site, is expanding into new markets with additional language support and features.

Pandora.TV launched in 2004 and has grown to become the “YouTube of Korea,” ranking as the countries 24th most popular site according to Alexa with 20 million monthly unique visitors, 2.5 billion monthly page views with 2.5 million hosted videos. Notably the company has taken $16 million over two rounds from Altos Ventures and DCM, said to be the largest foreign investment made in a Korean internet startup.

Pandora.TV offers a mix of YouTube style videos and Live streaming. Like YouTube, videos can be embedded, voted upon and comments left on each page. A key selling point is unlimited video storage.

As of today Pandora.TV is now available in English, Chinese, Japanese as well as its native Korean. New features rolled out with the international expansion include:
- HD quality video playback (H.264 codec support)
- multiple video upload (up to 5 files simultaneously)
- unlimited category creation
- site widgets.

Pandora.TV has also claimed cross-browser support as a new feature, however the Live Streaming service requires a download to view and stream that is only available to Windows users.

From techcrunch here

MySpace and Universal Music settle for new music channel

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008


This, summarised words from TechCrunch:
…MySpace has settled the pending litigation Universal Music. They’ll create a new MySpace Music joint venture, with equity stakes from all the major labels (except EMI, which is still negotiating).

Expect an announcement next week, and a launch of the new music property in July or August 2008.

The new company will own the MySpace music property, get a cash infusion of $120 million or so from parent company News Corp, and distribute that $120 million to Sony BMG, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group. In return, the litigation will be dropped and the labels will give streaming and downloading rights to their catalog to the new entity. Approximately $100 million of the News Corp. capital will go to Universal; the rest will go to Sony BMG and Warner.

Users will be able to stream music on demand, create playlists, and add widget music players to their profiles. The streaming will be advertising supported - at first via display ads (like Imeem), and later via in-stream audio ads. DRM-free downloads will also be available, either advertising supported or on a pay basis like Amazon’s Music Store.

Advertising revenue will be split among the joint venture partners according to their equity stakes, not based on play counts.

Whole article is here on Techcrunch